Barbour, I. G. (1966).
Issues in Science and Religion. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Retrieved from
http://aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.1974993
Barbour, I. G. (1998). Religion and Science: Historical and contemporary issues. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Barbour, I. G. (2000). When Science Meets Religion: Enemies, Strangers, or Partners? New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Barbour, I. G. (2002). On Typologies for Relating Science and Religion.
Zygon®,
37(2), 345–360.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00432
Bélanger, J. J., Schori-Eyal, N., Pica, G., Kruglanski, A. W., & Lafrenière, M.-A. (2015). The
“more is less” effect in equifinal structures: Alternative means reduce the intensity and quality of motivation.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
60, 93–102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.005
Carter, N. T., Lake, C. J., & Zickar, M. J. (2010). Toward Understanding the Psychology of Unfolding.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
3(4), 511–514.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01283.x
Davoodi, T., & Lombrozo, T. (2022). Explaining the existential: Scientific and religious explanations play different functional roles.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
151(5), 1199.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001129
Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584.
Farias, M., Newheiser, A.-K., Kahane, G., & de Toledo, Z. (2013). Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
49(6), 1210–1213.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.008
Gould, S. J. (1999). Non-Overlapping Magisteria. Skeptical Inquirer, (July/August), 55–61.
Jackson, J. C., Jasko, K., Abrams, S., Atkinson, T., Balkcom, E., Kruglanski, A., … Halberstadt, J. (2024). Religious people view both science and religion as less epistemically valuable than non-religious people view science.
Religion, Brain & Behavior. Retrieved from
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2153599X.2024.2363750
Johnson, C., Thigpen, C. L., & Funk, C. (2020, August 26). On the Intersection of Science and Religion. Retrieved February 9, 2022, from Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project website:
https://www.pewforum.org/?p=33454
Johnson, K. A., Moon, J. W., Okun, M. A., Scott, M. J., O’Rourke, H. P., Hook, J. N., & Cohen, A. B. (2019). Science, God, and the cosmos: Science both erodes (via logic) and promotes (via awe) belief in God.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
84, 103826.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103826
Johnson, K. A., Okun, M. A., & Moon, J. W. (2023). The interaction of faith and science mindsets predicts perceptions of the relationship between religion and science.
Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology,
4, 100113.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100113
Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., & Sheveland, A. (2011). How many roads lead to Rome? Equifinality set-size and commitment to goals and means.
European Journal of Social Psychology,
41(3), 344–352.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.780
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning.
Psychological Bulletin,
108, 480–498.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Legare, C. H., Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K. S., & Harris, P. L. (2012). The Coexistence of Natural and Supernatural Explanations Across Cultures and Development.
Child Development,
83(3), 779–793.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x
Legare, C. H., & Gelman, S. A. (2008). Bewitchment, biology, or both: the co-existence of natural and supernatural explanatory frameworks across development.
Cognitive Science,
32(4), 607–642.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802066766
Leicht, C., Sharp, C. A., LaBouff, J. P., Zarzeczna, N., & Elsdon-Baker, F. (2021). Content Matters: Perceptions of the Science-Religion Relationship.
The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion,
0(0), 1–24.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2021.2003111
Marin, P., & Lindeman, M. (2021). How do people perceive the relationship between science and religion? The roles of epistemic and ontological cognition.
Applied Cognitive Psychology,
35(5), 1146–1157.
https://doi.org/10/gm5n7f
Polt, R. F. H. (1999). Heidegger: an introduction. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
Rios, K., & Aveyard, M. (2019). Science-religion compatibility beliefs across Middle Eastern and American young adult samples: The role of cross-cultural exposure.
Public Understanding of Science,
28(8), 949–957.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869815
Rios, K., & Roth, Z. C. (2020). Is
“me-search” necessarily less rigorous research? Social and personality psychologists’ stereotypes of the psychology of religion.
Self and Identity,
19(7), 825–840.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1690035
Roberts, J. S. (2018). Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. In W. J. Van Der Linden, Handbook of Item Response Theory (Vol. 1, pp. 369–390). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Shipman, H. L., Brickhouse, N. W., Dagher, Z., & Letts, W. J. (2002). Changes in student views of religion and science in a college astronomy course.
Science Education,
86(4), 526–547.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10029
Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., & Kay, A. C. (2012). Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Existential Threat: Insights from Paul Tillich.
Social Cognition,
30(6), 734–757.
https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.734
Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study.
Science Education,
95(6), 1000–1025.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20459
Van Leeuwen, N. (2014). Religious credence is not factual belief.
Cognition,
133(3), 698–715.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.015
Woolley, M., Bowie, R. A., Hulbert, S., Thomas, C., Riordan, J.-P., & Revell, L. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on the relationship between secondary school departments of science and religious education: Independence or mutual enrichment?
The Curriculum Journal,
35(3), 378–395.
https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.233
Yasri, P., Arthur, S., Smith, M. U., & Mancy, R. (2013). Relating Science and Religion: An Ontology of Taxonomies and Development of a Research Tool for Identifying Individual Views.
Science & Education,
22(10), 2679–2707.
https://doi.org/10/f5d67m
Yasri, P., & Mancy, R. (2012). Understanding Student Approaches to Learning Evolution in the Context of their Perceptions of the Relationship between Science and Religion.
International Journal of Science Education,
36(1), 24–45.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715315